Quote Originally Posted by delusionsofNORMALity
it's not a matter of facts or a system of knowledge or even deductive reasoning that determines reality. it is our perception.

1+1=2 may be false depending on your perception of the elements of the equation.

as perception changes reality changes, as reality changes the "facts" change, what was true then is false now.
I would dispute that, I think it gets to the core even if I'd pose it differently semantically.

But all I wanted to really pose was whether or not falsifibility should be held objectively against every belief we hold. As a means of critiquing most of harris' posts concerning a scientific rejection of certain possibilities. I don't think it holds up to scrutiny is all.

He's building sandcastles...
Polymirize Reviewed by Polymirize on . My thoughts on athiesm I believe that Athiesm, in itself, is hypocritical. To Acknowledge one possability over another on something that as of now, we can not fully understand, over another is hypocritical. I believe in being agnostic. If you are going to have a belief in something that no one, as of now, has the ability to learn the exact truth of, you need to consider every possability. Discuss :) Rating: 5