"NO HE WOULDN'T. God is not a "liar" for not existing, because if he never existed in the first place, he never could have lied in the first place. Your criteria even for the non-existence of god requires the assumption that god directly made a claim, though he didn't exist... you see how this goes around and around."


Weren't we left some literature called the word of God? Did I call it that? Even our money says "In God We Trust". Now if you don't believe his claims, try disproving them. If you say that God does not exist, you're basically calling him a liar cause he says he exists and made everything. Just cause you don't believe in his word doesn't mean it's not his word. Heaven and Earth will pass, but his word will endure forever.

Go ahead and put your faith and trust in the spaghetti monster and I will put mine in God. Whatever works for you.
Pass That Shit Reviewed by Pass That Shit on . My thoughts on athiesm I believe that Athiesm, in itself, is hypocritical. To Acknowledge one possability over another on something that as of now, we can not fully understand, over another is hypocritical. I believe in being agnostic. If you are going to have a belief in something that no one, as of now, has the ability to learn the exact truth of, you need to consider every possability. Discuss :) Rating: 5