Ya know, 'hydro' has nothing to do with quality, at all. Nada, zilch, no correlation whatsoever. When you say you bought hydro, that isn't saying anything except that the plants got their nutrients one way rather than another, and nobody cares how the plant got its nutrients while it was living except the guy who grew it. 'Hydro' is not a synonym of 'good quality'. Of course, that doesn't mean hydro-grown stuff can't be good, but it doesn't mean it IS good either. You can grow 0.1 percent THC commercial hemp hydroponically, and get nothing but headaches when you smoke it. I have no idea why people use that term to describe pot. And how can you tell from looking at a dried bud how it got its nutrients when it was alive anyway?

"I just bought a computer, and it was assembled on the factory line!"

"As opposed to what, being assembled by hand?"

"Right."

"How can you tell it was assembled that way?"

"Well, it looks nice, so it must have been."

"Does it have good components? Does it run fast? Nice video card?"

"I have no idea, man, but it was assembled on a FACTORY LINE, so it must be good!"

See what I mean? Who cares how computers are assembled, and who cares how pot is grown? The things that matter are, how good is it, and how much does it cost.

Sorry, pet peeve of mine, people using the term 'hydro' as a synonym of 'good'.