Quote Originally Posted by Myth1184
even if it does pass, which i doubt it will, Cities will lose Federal Funding if they fail to arrest people for Posesson violations, and I highly doubt they will risk Federal Funding so a few people can carry weed on them. The only reason this is on the ballot is because you can get any issue put on a ballot if you collect a few signatures.

I couldn't disagree more with you. They're violating the same federal law by allowing their citizens to smoke, grow, possess, and obtain legally for medical necessity. What would be the difference in the states allowing all citizens regardless of medical need or not to at least possess and consume marijuana? Nothing? That's my guess. I really think Nevada would take the $45 an ounce tax and to satisfy the people's will for marijuana to be legal, over bullshit federal funding..once a few states enact this, the federal government will fall to it's knees...because once it happens, there will be so much publicity to marijuana...And I highly doubt people are going to say the same things about it when everyone is allowed to be around others legally while stoned...and once again, any time I read one of your posts it makes me think you're an anti-pot.
Markass Reviewed by Markass on . Nevada and Colorado ammendments Ive been reading about these two states making the ballot for a month or so and Im really excited. I wanted to hear the opinion from someone who lived in that state. Whats your opinion and do you think that its a possibility for it to be legal to carry up to an ounce for someone over 21. Im crossing my fingers. Rating: 5