I sort of agree but i would define faith in science as faith in observation. This applies to everything, philosophy and religion. So I don??t really think science should be singled out.

And well it has proven a very effective and useful thing to have "faith" in. So i think it is incorrect to say that someone has faith in it.
Since faith is a ??belief that is not based on proof?. Science effectively gets us information, you could say this is it??s purpose.
Yes science has basic flaws.
1) it is based on the Principle of the uniformity of nature. Which is probably the biggest theoretical flaw
2) observation may be false. This is more of a philosophical exercise than anything.
3)probably others too

Regardless of these flaws science works, this is obvious no one can deny the amazing pace science progresses at and what it creates. We know it works, so what is there to have faith in?? I guess we also have faith in our knowledge of these advances, faith in our memory. Non of these things are specific to science


Oh and:

???And these proteins...bond together...and create a life form...that's not made of protein.??
Life is largely made of proteins