Would you smoke weed if it had no effect?

[slipknotpsycho]

yes because i enjoy the act of smoking, not just weed either, i like the taste i like the smell, i don't just smoke cuz i like to get high. i smoke weed because i like every aspect about it.

[wishmaster244]

if there is no effect at all, then of course nobody would smoke it

[LIP]

I'd still smoke it.

[yoda]

no, cuase that'd be like jacking off w/o cumming, nobody would do it.

[big smoke07]

I seriously doubt any of us would....

[slipknotpsycho]

well let me rephrase, if a pack of joints was the same as a pack of cigarettes, THEN i would, but i wouldn't be paying prices i do now.

but then again, it wouldn't be illegal anymore [atleast i should hope not] and that means the tobacco companies would be jacking it up wtih all kinds of chemicals and it would probably end up being just as, if not more harmful than cigarettes, so i don't know...

i guess the only way i would was if it cost the same as cigarettes, and it was just pure marijuana, no additives or any tricky shit.

[Nochowderforyou]

If weed was the same price as it is now and had no effect, then no, I would no way in hell smoke it anymore. If it was cheap enough though, I'd probably enjoy a good flavoured THC-less smoke on occasion, but I wouldn't make it a common thing.

All this talk about de-stonededness weed is bumming me out.

[Pipe Dreams]

Well fuck

I smoke cigarettes, but it doesnt neccarily have an effect on me. SO I really dont know man.

[cannabis campbell]

erm i dunno tbh thats a good question well obviously if it was just like a cig, then it would be the same price so probably yeah i would buy it for the taste

B&H = Blow & Hash cigs

[orangeman]

no, cuase that'd be like jacking off w/o cumming, nobody would do it.

Lol omfg, perfect comparisson.