Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf_The_Grey
But you're creating a false dilemma, that the witnesses are either liars or right. Everything seems to come down to that with you for some reason:wtf:.
I'm not up to date on the thread so sorry if this has already been covered, but are there actually several witness tesimonies in multiple works of the resurrection, or are you're "multiple witnesses" really just multiple being in a single story? Because if it's just one story with many people, then the only actual witness is one person, not many.



erm.... Different branches of science tend not to disagree with each other because they're not even arguing with each other. A biologist and a rocket scientist aren't going to argue about the origin of life for instance.
Scientists in the same field will absolutely argue about some things, but definately not most things. This is why we have hypothesis, theory, established theory, and law. The first two are up for debate, established theory is seldom debated unless there's a major shakeup in the foundations of the field, and law is strait-up law. Regardless they are NOT matters of faith because the theories are based on observable, testable, and consistantly repeatable evidence. God is only a hypothesis, and the theory of evolution does not mean the "hypothesis of evolution" as many creationists seem to think. I would advise you not to make claims on the verifiable nature of science unless you actually understand it in-depth yourself.

In the real world of logic and science, love and hate are the products of seratonin, dopamine, endorphines, and norapinephrine which actually are created in the brain.
Finally someone that Does understand the scientific method.. Well stated responce...... :thumbsup: