^^You do realize that it's a british medical journal, right? To my knowledge it's not an election year there.The methadology is the the same one the us government relies on when they say "x number of people died in darfur". What is certain to give a very inaccurate number is to do what the us is doing to arrive at their number, which is to look a dead certificates in a place with basically no government. Who counts the dead once the gravedigger is killed? By that methadology the death toll in darfur is 0.
andruejaysin Reviewed by andruejaysin on . Huge gaps in Iraq death estimates Ya Bush....Poland.....I mean Iraq sure had them weapons of mass destruction! Fucken Nazi. ------------------------------------------------------------------- http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6045112.stm The estimate that about 655,000 people have died in Iraq as a result of the 2003 invasion is such a large figure that it has led to two differing interpretations. Those who had faith in an earlier report from 2004 - also published in the medical journal The Lancet - are now able Rating: 5