the point isn't to win. liberatarians have been running for years. the point is: the more votes he receives this year the more federal funds he receives next year. but then again he's an independant.
i can't stand when people say that candidates should join forces, that would defeat the whole person of a guy like kinky running in the first place.
it's funny though, pbs here ran 2 hour segments the week prior to elections on bell, friedman, grandma, and perry and i watched them all.
the thing is, i couldn't figure out a single candidates stand on any issues afterwards. it's almost like they avoided talking about it? maybe i just have a bad memory.
in lighter news, i like candy.
mikeyfaces Reviewed by mikeyfaces on . Kinky / Bell I think that if Kinky really wanted to help Texas he would have joined forces with Chris Bell. They would have easily won if they became allies. I was going to vote for Kinky, but now I'm starting to think that he's in the running JUST for publicity. If he had a progressive goal in mind he should have just joined Bell. Any thoughts? Rating: 5