feel free to present an argument I would like that, no one has yet. and it blows.

when you speak of pure genius about the world and stuff. are you talking about intelligent design (hopes so)

so here is the argument as I see it (As an analogy)

a man is walking down the beach and sees a watch in the sand. HE looks at it sees how complex it is and can only assume that it was made by an intelligent being, ie human.

Now when someone looks at life in any form which is hundreds of times more complex than a watch and not draw the conclusion that it was also made by an intelligent being?

…
harris7 Reviewed by harris7 on . Philosophy of GOD This thread is meant as a continuation/restarting of another thread ā??arguments supporting Godā?¦ā?. The idea of this thread is to have more of a philosophical discussion. With the starting argument: When first presented the idea of God no man should accept it. It is much more reasonable to accept that there is no God than to assume there is. As this is a magical or mystical event and no person should believe this with out reason. So The existence of no God is much more likely Rating: 5