Philosophy of GOD

[harris7]

Since you're a smart ass, why would a police report prove it happened? Because we told them it happened?
What if you don't believe the report like like you don't believe the scriptures?

It's comical to me that you would instantly believe any other man except the men that wrote the Word of God. It's obvious that you guys automatically disregard the Word cause it's the Word not cause you have any facts that prove it wrong.

you are jumping to conclusions and very quickly too

did you know that eye witness accounts are actually very inaccurate

essentially your argument is that:
------------------------------
It is written in the Bible

so they it true
----------------
correct?

If so, do you not at least doubt or question the accuracy or validity of these statements.

Do you wonder if someone has changed them over time. What about the different translations of the bible, have you read these, are they the same?

Is it conceivable that this book was written 1500 years ago, and only says it is older

Is it possible that someone in a position of power wanted to capitalize on the beliefs of say a country, so he changed the bible so he could use it to better control them.

Do you find it strange that the â??truthâ?� happens to be the best method of controlling a large population?

harris7 Reviewed by harris7 on 10-13-2006. Philosophy of GOD This thread is meant as a continuation/restarting of another thread â??arguments supporting Godâ?¦â?�. The idea of this thread is to have more of a philosophical discussion. With the starting argument: When first presented the idea of God no man should accept it. It is much more reasonable to accept that there is no God than to assume there is. As this is a magical or mystical event and no person should believe this with out reason. So The existence of no God is much more likely Rating: 5