My religion is hendonic discorian elementism.
Because of the discorian in me my pickyness with vocabulary is ridiculous.
So I refuse to use the termonology of "god" because throughout history it has been blown out of context.
INstead i view the situation in context with all life forms that have electrical energy. Or even Etherical for how ever often that term is mentioned.....
To me i view it as a giant shard made of of nearly infinet smaller shards.
Each life form each world, each spec, each dot in a dimension/plane/w/e all add together, shard by shard, peice by peice, to create the shard that you know.

now if you used the term "god" then i would infer you seek control.
Well the big picture of all those shards is just a giant shard... and if an individual 'god' as you call it is in control then fuck off.
theres to many shards to consider into new factors blah blah blah blah blah...
get over it.
its not that simple.
or is it?
or maby im not tellign you something...
or even better yet....
Maby you dont want to tell yourself something?
i dunno but im ditching this thread i got some reports to write.
Jacop Reviewed by Jacop on . Philosophy of GOD This thread is meant as a continuation/restarting of another thread ā??arguments supporting Godā?¦ā?. The idea of this thread is to have more of a philosophical discussion. With the starting argument: When first presented the idea of God no man should accept it. It is much more reasonable to accept that there is no God than to assume there is. As this is a magical or mystical event and no person should believe this with out reason. So The existence of no God is much more likely Rating: 5