This thread has gone horribly wrong!

None of the positions here have any philosophical merit.

The reason for this is that there was not given any requirements for what "god" is. As the theologist James F. Ross said "With no description or definition to work from, we will literally fail to know what we are talking about."

The phrase "God exists" is a metaphysical utterance which cannot be true or false. Once it is said that "God exists(or does not exist)" it must be asked "What is it you are claiming existence of"
moorephened Reviewed by moorephened on . Philosophy of GOD This thread is meant as a continuation/restarting of another thread ā??arguments supporting Godā?¦ā?. The idea of this thread is to have more of a philosophical discussion. With the starting argument: When first presented the idea of God no man should accept it. It is much more reasonable to accept that there is no God than to assume there is. As this is a magical or mystical event and no person should believe this with out reason. So The existence of no God is much more likely Rating: 5