If you say the existence of God can only be found where the light of reason doesn't reach, then the argument is moot. Philosophy is logic, and logic is math--'this, therefore that'. If you can't come to some rational evidence of God's existence, then all you have to go on is 'hearsay' or divine intervention.

The 'hearsay' is really hurting in the credibility department, and the few I've known claiming 'divine intervention' have spent some quality time with psychosis.
Hamlet Reviewed by Hamlet on . Philosophy of GOD This thread is meant as a continuation/restarting of another thread ā??arguments supporting Godā?¦ā?. The idea of this thread is to have more of a philosophical discussion. With the starting argument: When first presented the idea of God no man should accept it. It is much more reasonable to accept that there is no God than to assume there is. As this is a magical or mystical event and no person should believe this with out reason. So The existence of no God is much more likely Rating: 5