I have said nothing of science. I am asking a simple question. Why would someone change there beliefs. Everyone starts off life not believing and some change.

I am not here to tell you that Science said this… and therefore your wrong.

I am saying, that it is not my job to prove you wrong. IT is YOUR (not you specifically) job to prove that “god created all things”. For example

I say:
I have a dragon in my room

My friend says
No you don’t. I don’t have any reason to believe that

I say
Prove to me you don’t have a reason to believe that…

This is because I made the statement of existence. You don’t have to prove non-existence it is just assumed.
harris7 Reviewed by harris7 on . Philosophy of GOD This thread is meant as a continuation/restarting of another thread ā??arguments supporting Godā?¦ā?. The idea of this thread is to have more of a philosophical discussion. With the starting argument: When first presented the idea of God no man should accept it. It is much more reasonable to accept that there is no God than to assume there is. As this is a magical or mystical event and no person should believe this with out reason. So The existence of no God is much more likely Rating: 5