This thread has gone horribly wrong!

None of the positions here have any philosophical merit.

The reason for this is that there was not given any requirements for what "god" is. As the theologist James F. Ross said "With no description or definition to work from, we will literally fail to know what we are talking about."

The phrase "God exists" is a metaphysical utterance which cannot be true or false. Once it is said that "God exists(or does not exist)" it must be asked "What is it you are claiming existence of"