Lets all keep in mind though, nobody here is the "bad guy" really. We can argue on logic and philosophy, but we all think we're doing the right thing. From my point of view, I see an obligation to stop the spread of ignorance and fallable logic, in the hopes of inspiring more to bring this world into an age of reason.
From Krogith's point of view, he feels an obligation to discourage us from turning our backs on the most important aspect of our existence, and the solution to all our troubles. and indeed, if I were so certain of god I would most likely debate just as passionately to save the souls of billions.
mrdevious Reviewed by mrdevious on . Atheism What non-mutual original doctrines that have contributed to the well being of anything have come directly from atheism, and atheism only. Now remember, this can't include buddhism, because if you know your history buddha was from a royal line. I know damn well his family had religion just like every other culture. So, from a sociological point of view; his ethics were influenced by the ethics of others who were ultimatley influenced by religion at one point or another. Now, I know the Rating: 5