Argument supporting god...?

[Stedric]

Can science prove that the earth did not evolve six thousand years ago?

How does an earth evolve? Evolution is restricted to living beings, and there was an earth before there were living beings on it. The earth does not evolve.

And assuming that science could NOT prove that the earth was formed six thousand years ago (which it can), that would mean nothing. From a philosophical standpoint, the burden of proof is upon the accuser. I can't prove that you aren't being anally raped by space-monkeys as I write this, but I imagine that that isn't the case (feel free to say otherwise). So you have to prove that the earth WAS formed six thousand years ago.

[Krogith]

The bible doesn't say it only exsisted 6000 years ago. find me a scripture to suport that. your comming from a flase idea.

the part about the formming of the world is Genesis, read the account and then argue your point.

[Ignatius]

The Bible is non admissable evidence in a scientific argument.

Overruled.

[Pass That Shit]

LOL

I'm done proving, but don't hate. I have joy in this cold world cause I know what's ahead of me. Peace

[Ignatius]

No hate here brother.

Peace to you too.

[Mud Dauber]

Wow the Bible mentioned dinosaurs and lava! It must be real then. I wonder why there aren't any stories about people living in the belly of dinosaurs and magic boats with all the dinosaurs floating over the lava? Or how about a caveman calling down a swarm of prehistoric bugs because his people are overworked by the local slave driver. I think they should add these for more entertainment value. Right now it's losing out to the Lion Witch and the Wardrobe and Tolkiens novels for overall fictional novel enterainment value.

Actually, from an archeological and an historical standpoint, there are things in the Bible that did happen, and people in the Bible that did exist.

I go lie down for a couple of hours and watch the ceiling spin and come back and it's WWIII.

Iggy, you are insisting that Krogith answer your question, but you never answered mine.

[Ignatius]

I don't remember the exact question. Can you ask me again and I'll try to answer it.

[Mud Dauber]

Youve got to be kidding me, right ? I'm sitting here coughing up a lung with the biggest case of medicine head ever seen in the free world, and you want me to trawl through the pages of the thread to find the question ???

You look for it

[MastaChronic]

i just would like to say that i dont believe in god persay. i believe that there are creative and destructive forces-yin&yang-there is no good or evil(has anyone noticed that god is just good with an 'o' taken out and devil is just evil with a 'd' added to it?)i combine this yin and yang philosophy with the american indian belief of the great spirit and it works just fine for me. i dont believe that when i die i will go to heaven OR hell, but rather that i will return to the great spirit and merge with him to attain a state of omnipitence and when i have recieved enough knowledge from the ways of the world and the great spirit then i will be reincarnated in the form that best suits the actions of my previous life, but no form is either good or evil as they all serve their purpose in nature. on another point i associate nature with being creative and man being destructive(look at the way the world is and what we do to eachother)i can use my belief to explain things at a base level, maybe not the complexities. i believe in equal exchange, to gain something, you have to lose something. take this for example: you load a bowl with some weed, burn it and inhale the smoke(destructive, as you no longer have any weed)but in return you get high(creative) you destroyed the weed to create a feeling of pleasantness and well-being. make sense to anyone?

[MastaChronic]

sorry for double posting, but i believe that christians, catholics, methodists etc. will be reincarnated as cows, pigs, chickens, and other unthinking animals simply raised by the thousands for food.