tabaccos sucks

[Delta9 UK]

No, you may not FEEL it, but its there, and im right.

Pauls right, alot of kids these days cant roll a joint for shit, but also as he said, its an art, and when you master it you'll never get higher.

With tobacco yes, they are synergistic in effect.

To be honest though LIP you should try a Volcano - for everyday caining its what I use, a good joint,pipe,bong,blunt though never goes a miss.

I just use the Volcano because of health reasons. The house doesn't reek of weed and my girlfriend won't bash my skull in.

see - health reasons :thumbsup:

[CheebaMan]

ida went in the bathroom and hollowed that shit out n fill it with weed then go puff it in front of em theyd probly think i have some kind of reaction to tobacco

[Stoner369]

i agree with LIP, spliffs are the shit! Im only 15 but after smoking rollups for along time ive got pretty decent at rolling. To be honest over here in England spliffs are the only thing people use for weed, and they nearly allways put tobbaco in it to help it burn and use less weed.

Lip - wats it like down your endz, are spliffs the most popular down there aswell as the midlands.

[LIP]

Yeah, im in London, spliffs are the most popular way of smoking in europe, let alone England.

bongs are ok, but at the end of the day it's all a preferance thing. If it gets you high, what more is there to do... thats the aim of the game

[Stoner369]

LIP you don't actually look like you do in your avator do you!!!! lol!!!
sorry if this is offension but i'm buzzed of some of the pengest bud ever!!!! oh my god!! sorry i'm fuckeewd! bre ath

[LIP]

lol, nah i dont, it's a character from a TV program from canada.

Im stoned too

[huh]

if you dont torch your bowl if you just light them and let them roast decuctive reasoning will tell you the rate is the exact same all those tests saying joints are better say so because of thc burnoff in lighting. they can say what they want personally i see no noticable difference in how high i get from the same amount of weed in joints, blunts bongs pipes or whatever i might be smoking. facts and figures can say what they want but there isnt a noticable difference unless paper has magic effects that produce thc

have you ever scraped the resin out of your bowl? im sure you have. you know whats in that resin? there is thc in that resin....thc that didnt go into your lungs when you smoked it. joints dont get resin because all the stuff that would turn into resin is re-smoked. thats why a lot of people say that roach weed is more potent, its pretty much resinated weed.

just think about it

[Stoner369]

and anoughter thing LIP in london do you do what we do and always put a carboard roach at the end, and when we refer to roaches its the carboard bit and not the resin at the end.

[sclabman]

while nothing beats a joint when your with some chill friends, a vape really is very effective.

i made one out of a light bulb and i use about 1/2 to 1/3 of the weed, and there's little smell (which helps a lot for people who live with parents). :smokin:

[I just love weed]

But Vape's are shit compared to joints. Joints have the highest THC transfer rate, which means a joint beats a bong/vape/pipe.

Anyway, a joint is more sociable...vape arnt at all.

and personaly i concider them a waste of money when the money could be spent on more skunk.

I read an article which said exaclty what you said but in a scale of 1-100 the difference was mabye 4 or 5. joints were like 66 vapes were around 62 (this is actually the perecent of thc extracted compared to the actual amount in the bud) Then you can use that remeaning 40 perecent in, as he stated, some excellent brownies, therefore you get a much much higher percent in the long run and u get a slighly smaller amount when smoking or vaping. Also take into account that joints smoke alot when your not actually hitting them therefore they let off alot of smoke that coudl be inhaled. When vaping you lose nothing, therefore the amount is probably very similar, maybe even more for vapes depending on how much smoke you lose.