Yo HIGHlandsRancher:

Sorry to jump the gun, and assume you intended disinformation. Apologies :-)

I was in radio for many years. One thing to keep in mind in regard to radio and tv is they are only concerned with advertising. If you tune out, it is not in theyâ??re best interest. If they get some garbage-spouting clown on their talk show, theyâ??ll wait to discredit him or her till the end. Even though there may be information that makes the clownâ??s argument pointless, they would rather they get as many people pissed-off in the meantime. The mentality is that pissed off people donâ??t tune outâ?¦they stick around through the â??advertisingâ??. Ultimately, they do not even have to discredit the person on a talk show. Not their responsibility. Only in the case of a story. Newspapers do the same thing. They string you out over the course of several pages of Sears underwear ads, till you get to some small detail(s) at the end, which reduces the weight of the story. But, what do they care? Ultimately, reported all the info, even though it was crafted to get you to look at all the ads.

The most effective way to get the news (most info/shortest time) is the web. But, even the web has its caveats,like all that flashing shit, scattered around the screen. Also, web based news providers like Fox News, CNN do the same thing on the web as they do on television.
Nickelback Reviewed by Nickelback on . Incorrect info (amendment 44)!! PLEASE read this!! It has been stated by at least one individual on this board that the upcoming referendum for legalizing marijuana will do so for all people, including those 'under the age of 21'. This is not true! The post I saw was by someone who has only posted once. My initial thought is that this is disinformation to make you think it is a lost cause, and to cause you to blow off going to the voting booth. Please vote!! Here (below) is a link to a description of the issue. The new law would apply to Rating: 5