The way I see it, the conservatives are just as dangerous as the liberals. The liberals are so clouded by their hatred of Bush that they'll denounce any military action, claim 9/11 was an inside job, and firmly beleive that all Muslims are just happy, freedom loving folks without an angry bone in their body.

The conservatives, on the other hand, are so clouded by their anger and fear resulting from 9/11 that their willing to blow up anyone carrying the Koran. They blindly followed Bush into Iraq and then continue to come up with reasons for being their after it's been proven that their were no WMD's, no links to Al Qaeda, and no real threat to our security. Even worse, they fail to see that our being in Iraq has just pissed off thousands of angry young Muslims who were just pissed off camel jockeys before, but are now willing to strap on a bomb in the name of Allah. That's right folks, Bush has made us less safe from the threat of terrorism. Although I'm sure telling a conservative that is just as much a waste of time as telling a liberal that it really was Muslim terrorists that flew the planes into the Twin Towers and teh Pentagon.

People need to get a clue. Take a step towards the middle. Think for yourself and not what your parties tell you to think. $10 says Torog wouldn't be so supportive of the war if we had a gay President from San Francisco. But he'll gladly follow a moron from Texas. Sad, sad what America has come to.
Fengzi Reviewed by Fengzi on . In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims In The War On Terror, Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims (Don Feder 9/11 Meditation Alert) Don Feder.com ^ | 09/19/06 | Don Feder Posted on 09/20/2006 3:24:37 AM PDT In a recent commentary, former New York Mayor Ed Koch - a Democrat with at least half a brain (which makes him the leading intellectual light of his party) - asked rhetorically, "Why do so many Americans refuse to face the fact that our country is at war with international terrorism?" Because they're liberals? Rating: 5