Results 1 to 10 of 65
Hybrid View
-
10-17-2006, 04:32 PM #1
Senior Member
In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims
I agree with Ozarks, the war has nothing to do with oil. Nor terrorism, nor having a prescence in the Middle East. The war with Iraq is all about ego, namely George W. Bush's ego. Dubya had to do something to make his presidency noteworthy. He wanted to be the guy to take down Saddam. He would have figured a way to get us into Iraq one way or another. If Bin Laden had turned over a new leaf and became a florist, and Saddam turned over his "extensive stockpile" (LOL) of WMD's, Dubya would have sent the troops in the name of preventing camel abuse.
Fengzi Reviewed by Fengzi on . In The War On Terror,Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims In The War On Terror, Liberals Are More Dangerous Than Muslims (Don Feder 9/11 Meditation Alert) Don Feder.com ^ | 09/19/06 | Don Feder Posted on 09/20/2006 3:24:37 AM PDT In a recent commentary, former New York Mayor Ed Koch - a Democrat with at least half a brain (which makes him the leading intellectual light of his party) - asked rhetorically, "Why do so many Americans refuse to face the fact that our country is at war with international terrorism?" Because they're liberals? Rating: 5
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
I agree with the liberals on something (kind of) FCC.
By JaggedEdge in forum PoliticsReplies: 3Last Post: 04-28-2009, 11:45 PM -
Why The Liberals Want The US To Lose The War In Iraq
By Torog in forum PoliticsReplies: 19Last Post: 10-22-2007, 11:07 PM -
Help! Mom! There are Liberals Under My Bed!
By Psycho4Bud in forum PoliticsReplies: 19Last Post: 06-21-2007, 04:11 AM -
Head-in-the-Sand Liberals
By Breukelen advocaat in forum PoliticsReplies: 10Last Post: 09-25-2006, 10:26 PM -
Liberals reach new Low
By Myth1184 in forum PoliticsReplies: 3Last Post: 12-11-2005, 10:39 PM










Register To Reply
Staff Online