Quote Originally Posted by Jake Martinez
Oh my God, knock it OFF!

Just because someone disagrees with Bush, or even HATES them, and instead uses facts to defend Muslims...bloodthirsty fundamentalists though they may be...that does NOT make them an apologist! I think you've called me an apologist once, and I believe we should take religious fundamentalists around the world and pack them into Antartica with a few nuclear bombs--not missiles--to play with. An apologist IS the kind of person who'd say "Ahhh you're just a poor, confused soul" while Habib is sawing away at his/her neck with a fruit knife. All this is saying is that Iran IS NOT enriching uranium to weapon-grade, bomb-component uranium. Look past the obvious leftist propoganda and see the facts behind it. I thought you knew how to do that, Bong.

I read the article and IMO the writer doesn't really care if Iran blows off a bomb, the point of the article is to attack (hate) Bush. Blinded by hatred the writer is willing manipulate the facts to put Iran in the best possibly light, in order to strengthen his attack on Bush.

The possibility that Iran may murder 10's of millions given the opportunity,is ignored by the writer, why ? because it threatens to side track or dilute his "I hate Bush message". That's way I called him an "Iranian apologist" the stronger he can make Iran's case look the more legitimate his anti-Bush article looks.

I think you've called me an apologist once,
If I did, I'm sure you deserved it I never met to hurt you, and I certainly never meant for you to carry it around....let it go. It was just two guys debating, I apologize.
Ozarks Reviewed by Ozarks on . Neocon Iran Nuke Lies â??Outrageousâ? and â??Dishonestâ? Neocon Iran Nuke Lies â??Outrageousâ? and â??Dishonestâ? Once again, the Bush neocons have distorted International Atomic Energy Agency findings, as is their habit. â??U.N. inspectors have protested to the U.S. government and a Congressional committee about a report on Iranâ??s nuclear work, calling parts of it â??outrageous and dishonest,â?? according to a letter obtained by Reuters,â? a characterization in keeping with the Straussian neocon philosophy of lies and dissimulation. Rating: 5