Smoking economics 101.

[Inferius]

If you have ever used a vapouriser with decent weed you will know that study is bollocks.

So... if you can't trust that.. how can you trust the rest?
Imean if only one of their conclusions was obviously false, what have we to trust for the other conclusions?

[HypnotizedMind]

What fun is vaporising though?.

[graph]

What fun is vaporising though?.

I guess you've never done it right :dance:

Vaporizing is awesome. You feel like a scientist. Oh, lemme just adjust the way I breathe so that the ceramic heating element is given a little more time to rush the air past the dried botanical. See how smart you feel?


Oh, and to inferius, they specifically state that the test isn't accurate based on the cannabis they used. Not only that, but in chemistry they taught us that one test is never enough, and no bias should be made on a general level by one test. I mean, no offense to anyone, but if you were to base information off of ONE clinical trial, then you'd popping more pills than Cybill Sheppard. I have no idea who that person is, or what she's done, but I don't like her name.

[shoi]

the only point i was making was that a bong did filter out some THC...

[Reefer Rogue]

Bubbler ftw.