Smoking economics 101.

[HypnotizedMind]

joints..there cheaper at a price of 1.00 a pack to 1.00 a blunt wrap which means 32 more papers they conserve more and smoke just as well. but you gotta love the occasonal blunt.

This is why i prefer a bong over a pipe and a joint over a blunt.

feel free to give your opnions.

HypnotizedMind Reviewed by HypnotizedMind on 09-16-2006. Smoking economics 101. joints..there cheaper at a price of 1.00 a pack to 1.00 a blunt wrap which means 32 more papers they conserve more and smoke just as well. but you gotta love the occasonal blunt. This is why i prefer a bong over a pipe and a joint over a blunt. feel free to give your opnions. Rating: 5

[LuckyNiner]

Vaporizing for the win.

It's much better for the lungs, and conserves an amazing amount of weed.

Of course, if you can't afford one, then I would go a with bong. Cooler, filtered smoke, (THC is not water-soluble, so you're not losing it), and the ability to smoke just as much as you need, and have no excess smoke in the air (put out your bowl with a penny or something).

[usedchemicals]

joints..there cheaper at a price of 1.00 a pack to 1.00 a blunt wrap which means 32 more papers they conserve more and smoke just as well. but you gotta love the occasonal blunt.

This is why i prefer a bong over a pipe and a joint over a blunt.

feel free to give your opnions.

you just confused the fuck out of me

[graph]

Vaporizing for the win.

It's much better for the lungs, and conserves an amazing amount of weed.

Of course, if you can't afford one, then I would go a with bong. Cooler, filtered smoke, (THC is not water-soluble, so you're not losing it), and the ability to smoke just as much as you need, and have no excess smoke in the air (put out your bowl with a penny or something).

Bongs don't actually filter that much smoke. I know you didn't say that it did, I wa just adding.

Vaporizer for the win. It's good and good for you!

[LuckyNiner]

Bongs don't actually filter that much smoke. I know you didn't say that it did, I wa just adding.

Vaporizer for the win. It's good and good for you!

Well, yeah, but it certainly helps to cool it and filter out SOME of the harmful stuff you're inhaling, so why not? It's a much more pleasant smoke in my opinion than say, a joint or a pipe.

Anyway, glad we agree..wish I could afford a volcano, though.

Peace.:stoned:

[fasterspider]

Blunt wraps fuck up the weed.
Bongs are the most efficient way to smoke so why waste your weed? Vaporizors take away from the fun of smoking, they are too complicated and leave too much waste.
Not that I can't roll the sweetest joints you have ever seen but they are just a waste of smoke. And then there will always be a bogart on that joint if you smoke with friends, you know the guy. The one who has to hit it so hard that it runs halfway down the side, burning it unevenly and whatnot because he is so selfish and uncaring about the art of smoking.

[shoi]

http://www.ukcia.org/research/pipes.htm

basically this talks abt the efficency of various ways of smoking... i think ull be surpized

[jamstigator]

That is pretty interesting! So, efficiency-wise, joints seem to rule over any kind of waterpipe or bong or vaporizer. They didn't test just normal pipes, but I'd think those would be the same as joints, minus the carcinogens of the paper. I notice they also said nothing about eating cannabis which, in my (admittedly limited) experience, is by far the most efficient way to consume cannabis.

My smoking is generally: normal pipe (titanium bowl, tube, and screen), with an occasional joint, and eating. So, I guess I'm about as efficient as it's possible to get in regards to my consumption. That explains why pot seems to last me a very long time, yet I am often baked. Heh.

[Whos Carl]

If you have ever used a vapouriser with decent weed you will know that study is bollocks.

[Delta9 UK]

If you have ever used a vapouriser with decent weed you will know that study is bollocks.

+1

They didn't have a volcano