Why

[cambam]

Woah. Didn't even know this side of the forum existed.


And heres me trippin out thinkin' I was a bad-ass, by having 3 threads deleted in like an hour, when in reality, oe was, one was moved, and the other I forgot what it was called.


CSS

Classic Stoner Syndrome.

cambam Reviewed by cambam on 09-12-2006. Why Has my FAO Dryst thread been deleted? Rating: 5

[BobBong]

Woah. Didn't even know this side of the forum existed.


And heres me trippin out thinkin' I was a bad-ass, by having 3 threads deleted in like an hour, when in reality, oe was, one was moved, and the other I forgot what it was called.


CSS

Classic Stoner Syndrome.

We generally reserve this forum for constructive criticism.

[psychocat]

Right... the point is.. at least you can read what drsyt is trying to say.. isn't that what matters? I still haven't read anything posted that hasn't take more than a split second to understand..and even when i do. I remember that this is an english website in international waters, we ask people to post in english so that we can mildly understand what they're saying. As long as it's mildly understandable it's all good.
Cheers, and Stay stoned.
Bob.:stoned:

Can we make this less personal and keep Dryst out of it as you are perpetuating the stupidity of the original posters choice to name instead of just generalizing and saying that some folks posts are difficult to read ,(IMO) the problem is people just can't take constructive criticism.

May I ask why you are continuing to use Drysts name when I was making a blanket statement that easy to understand is better than unreadable babble?

I think we all agree that personal comments are uncalled for but the point made is still valid which is "confusion is avoided through clarity."

I also understand the language barriers since I speak a couple of languages other than my original tongue (English) and fully realise what the saying lost in translation means.

[cambam]

Can we make this less personal and keep Dryst out of it as you are perpetuating the stupidity of the original posters choice to name ...

Thats what I DIDN'T stoop to, name calling. Well done.:dance:

[cambam]

AND, if you notice, I was addressinig HIM, hence the FAO (Insert poster's Name here) title of the thread.

There. I can be as PC as you.

[BobBong]

Can we make this less personal and keep Dryst out of it as you are perpetuating the stupidity of the original posters choice to name instead of just generalizing and saying that some folks posts are difficult to read ,(IMO) the problem is people just can't take constructive criticism.

May I ask why you are continuing to use Drysts name when I was making a blanket statement that easy to understand is better than unreadable babble?

I think we all agree that personal comments are uncalled for but the point made is still valid which is "confusion is avoided through clarity."

I also understand the language barriers since I speak a couple of languages other than my original tongue (English) and fully realise what the saying lost in translation means.

Sorry i was simply using dryst as an example as the thread was made about and directed at dryst. I'm not making this an issue, as this is simply.. not one.
I understand you were making a blanket statement.. as was I. instead of making it in one post though, i made it into an openly critical conversation. perhaps to open?
I think we're both on the same page, and really dont need to continue this...As long as it is mildly understandable there's really no reason to complain is there? I don't think so..

:thumbsup:
Bob.

[kiwi]

This is going no where so I am going to close this thread. I think the other MODS have explained the situation well enuf for all to understand.:thumbsup: