>>>Exactly. You'd have to experience the thoughts yourself to know.

And what makes you think I haven't? Enlightenment contains nothing that you're talking about. Are you saying you've personally had a prophetic insight that did? If so I'd be interested to hear it.

>>Although you can learn enough non-experientially. For example the cycles of the galaxy and solar system and which ones humanity is entering next.

What are your sources? There are tens of books spouting this kind of stuff in every New Age shop in the world, full of prophecies that never happen and misinterpretations of a thousand real texts. The best lies are based in someone else's truth.

Take something like african civilisation. In an effort to prove that africans were the source of knowledge in ancient Egypt you'll see a good number of otherwise fine sites proclaiming that El Khemet, the old name for Egypt and the area around the northern Nile, means 'Land of the Black people'. Unfortunately it actually means 'the black land', with reference to the fact that the flood land around the nile IS black and very fertile. This name came through arabic and ended up in english as 'Alchemy' the ability to change one thing into something more precious, which is exactly what the Black Land did.

But, for anyone who has read one of these websites without knowing what the truth is, the name will forever mean 'Land of the Black People'. People read the Celestine Prophecies and the Da Vinci Code and believe them true because they have no other knowledge of the things they talk about. You have no basis for what you've said, all you're doing is trying to prove someone else's ideas.

I really can not buy into anything you're saying because I can't see any form of reference, truth, proof or solid basis in anything you've said. Of course, whether I or anyone else believes you is neither here nor there, I know that, this is just an open forum. But if you're going to try to appear sane and believable to the rest of the world then you have to start talking in real terms rather than coyly alluding to the idea that you know more than the rest of us.


Quote:
What has made it anything more than conjecture and a broad interpretation of anything and everything that would seem to fit in with this prophecy?


>>To you. Nothing.

Not just to me, but any other sane person who had a reasonable grasp of the way that facts and people can be manipulated. You can't make this personal and say it's just me who doesn't believe you. You can't say either that it's because of my lack of understanding or direct experience within meditation. This is just the same old same old I've heard for the last 40 odd years, that's been trotted out for as long as there've been books. Where is the evidence for what you're saying?

>>To those who experience knowing it, that very subjective experience.

Weeeelllll, I have experienced direct knowing, and a number of other people I know have too. No mention of this shift though. Not a word, not a hint. It would be a very strange experience of enlightenment or even a minor glimpse that contained the added idea that mankind is about to move to another vibratory plane, whatever that's meant to mean


Quote:
Saying 'The Universe is vast' doesn't mean anything at all.


>Yes.

>It does.

No.

It doesn't.

I watched the video as I'm a fan of Sagan. The Universe is vast, absolutely. But that still doesn't have anything to do with what you yourself are talking about. You say a shift is due. We ask for the proof and one of the things you offer is that the Universe is vast? LOL!

MelT
MelT Reviewed by MelT on . Transition Does anyone think that within this lifetime a transition to a higher vibratory plane is going to occur for the entire planet? This is the thing that happens and we call it "death". Only with death we do not keep our bodies, we lose them and must go to this higher plane in a "spirit" form. Supposedly, this is the last age of materialism on earth, and it's ending only within a few years, the earth will shake and rumble, destroy all life on it, and those who are the peak evolutions of the Rating: 5