Things about the 9/11 offical story i have problems with.

THE WORLD TRADE CENTER
"The collapse of both World Trade Center towers--and the smaller WTC 7 a few hours later--initially surprised even some experts. But subsequent studies have shown that the WTC's structural integrity was destroyed by intense fire as well as the severe damage inflicted by the planes. That explanation hasn't swayed conspiracy theorists, who contend that all three buildings were wired with explosives in advance and razed in a series of controlled demolitions. "


What is most important for you to understand is the law of nature. A law of nature can not be violated, a law of nature can not be changed, and a law of nature requires no enforcement. Steel has a melting point of 3000 degrees fahrenheit. The steel used in these buildings was certified by underwriters labatory for 2000 degrees fahrenheit for up to six hours. The highest temperature kerosene based jetfuel can burn under optimal conditions is 1700 degrees fahrenheit. Underwriters labatory estimated the steel itself was never heated above 500 degrees fahrenheit.

Now you must understand the law of freefall. If you dropped a penny from the top of the WTC, 110 floors up there, it would take 8-10 seconds to hit the ground. There is no scenario for a pancake effect of buildings falling that allows them to fall at the rate of freefall. They would take roughly a second for each floor to collapse.

The goverments story makes no sense what so ever. I am not speculating at all, the above i posted are all FACTS that you can not refute. The goverment was behind 9/11. It's obvious.

Also, look at the suspicious activity going on before 9/11. The owner of the WTC's taking out an insurance policy six weeks before 9/11. walking away with $1.2 Billion in PURE profit, although he was hoping for $2.4 Billion.

Someone attempted to make money with unusual stock trades right before the terrorist attacks of September 11. Who knew to bet that United Airlines would lose money? The goverment knows, why dont they tell us?

I'm going to quote tvnewsorlies here regarding this subject, because it is so true. (Regarding societies opinion on "conspiracy" theories. Kind of ironic since the biggest conspiracy is the goverments offical story!!!!!!!!!


They absolutely refuse to accept even the most convincing proof because they dare not admit to themselves that they have been lied to by officials in whom the placed their trust.

It is currently standard practice in America to simply dismiss any piece of information that punches a hole in any widely accepted explanation of a disturbing event. In many cases, especially when a serious crime is in question, the "conspiracy theory" tag is immediately attached to any new discovery about the event. Information related to such important topics such as 9/11, election fraud, the new world order, secret societies, or globalization is too often ignored as part of a baseless conspiracy theory even before any of it is ever presented, discussed, or evaluated.

There seems to be no set criteria for dismissing information as a foolish conspiracy theory. The only prerequisite for information to be so categorized seems to be the desire to reject it. The reason for the rejection does not seem to matter. It appears that anything people do not want to believe is simply set aside as not believable.
pwn3dy0 Reviewed by pwn3dy0 on . Demolition of WTC not true http://www.implosionworld.com/ Rating: 5