Quote Originally Posted by BobBong
Owners.. actually.. they perfer to use the bandwidth storing posts and threads rather than have it going towards pictures in signatures..
It is a nice feature.. yes.. but it also can create problems in the sense of annoyance and extra moderation. You can see how long some make their signatures without the use of pictures...it'd increase the literal size of the posts... Also consider the frequency of posts that are done.. allowing pictures to be displayed would put a considerable load on the server.
If a person were to reply say 4 times on the first page of the thread..

:stoned:

Cheers and Sorry..
But nobody gets to put pictures in their signature, not even cafe members.

Bob.

hmmm just as i suspected. thanks...