Quote Originally Posted by couch-potato
You and I are one of a kind. When I'm blazed, I'm a mad thinker, I think of all sorts of crap. The cats being cute thing makes sense, but about the DNA and how nature can make a code, that's why I'm a Christian.
If you look at the facts, Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection is either bogus, or incomplete.
Scientific Theory, as opposed to Theology, is open to revision and further research. That science is not claimed to be 100% correct is due to diligence and the desire for better explanations. Religion is not open to this. However, even the Catholic Church has admitted that Evolution is probably correct, and creationists often accept Evolution for animals, but usually just exclude human beings from the Evolution equation.

His theory is that all organisms are in a constant struggle of adaptation, and the animals who have an advantages over others will live and reproduce. Survival of the Fittest, the weaker animals will die. As the enviroment changes, these animals are forced to adapt to the cirumstances.
Survival of the fittest is not necessarily one of physical capability.

Given that variation is inherited through genes (which, there is no evidence of, that is why apes still exist, and there are no half-ape half-humans out there), all evolution occurs through numerous slight, successful mutations.
There is no evidence that we are descended directly from Chimps, and further work needs to be done as to where man fits in. Were talking about millions of years ago - so it's very difficult.

Now, let's take the human eye as an example. Should Darwin be true, how, exactly does a creature even begin to develop an eye? Humans have extremely complex, camera-type eyes. The pupil acts as a shutter, the lens gathers light and focuses it on the retina to form an image. Different colors of light which have different wavelengths would cause a blurred image, however our eyes are smart enough to change it's density so that we can see clearly. The eye has unique muscles, allowing it to move at ridiculously fast speeds. I'm not even halfway done explaining how we have vision, see how complicated this shit gets?
The human eye is not as good, in many regards, as other creatures' - the eagle comes to mind, as well as other birds of prey.

The chances of any creature to develop an eye as complicted as this, are virturally impossible. Sure, animals can survive with more primative eyes, look at a jellyfish. Can you explain how humans evolved our eyes though "slight, successful variations through genetic mutation"? Nobody can. Now, I'm not going to preach to you saying how great God is, but look at the facts.
There are no "scientific facts", but reasonably rational people accept certain things, with more research in the future, without ascribing supernatural events to these occurrences. The idea of "God", even to the religious, is not a "fact". It is based on faith.