Quote Originally Posted by Captain Hanks
life can only come from life, it's a law of science
Well don't just sit there, show us this "law of science"! Or are you using the 2 very impressive terms "law" and "science" so as to leave little question in the minds of the ignorant. This sounds a lot like when I'd argue for legalizing marijuana on other boards and people would say "it's makes you stupid, it's been scientifically proven".

therefore there must be a creator
This seems to be a popular way of creationist thinking, but it's neither scientific nor logical. God is only a concept, a hypothesis, an idea to fit any missing puzzle piece. We're in situation B (our existence as we currently know it), and that situation must be the result of a situation A (creation, evolution, or a third option not yet discovered). Even if one of our situation A hypothesis (evolution) is proven false, that doesn't mean the credit goes to the other situation A by default. To simply say God's work is proven because we don't have another explanation is like saying a thousand years ago "well, we figure the moon could only be rising every night by fairies lifting it, or a gods chariot dragging it. since we've proven beyond a doubt that fairies don't exist, that proves it's a god's chariot". This really is the core flaw I've bene seeing in creationist logic which has ultimately lead to my atheistic standpoint.

because of all the theories of evolution none of them suggest we came from life
Well actually, evolution explains all life as coming from life, so I'm not sure what you mean. Could you clarify?