that graph is almost as ignorant as the current drug classifications, although it looks more favorably on cannabis, there are some serious oversights there.

its pretty plain to see that these results came from bullshit statistical analysis and correlation rather than a real in depth scientific study.

e's less harmfull than cannabis? come on... i like the occasional pill myself, but please! smoke a joint every day for a year, no problems compared to if you get pilled up every day...jesus, now that would fry your brain good style.

diazepan/triazepan, and ket less dangerous than alcahol? i dont think so,
what a load of bollocks!

and i think the only reason khat is at the bottom is cause its so un-heard of in the UK no one really cares about it, quite a nasty stimulant by all accounts.

GHB? since when was date-raping considered less dangerous than getting stoned? wasnt the figures supposed to take social consequences into account also?

i despair somtimes, i really do.
babystarbud Reviewed by babystarbud on . UK: Drugs and prohibition Certain areas of human conduct lend themselves so readily to bad science that you have to wonder if there is a pattern emerging. Last week the parliamentary science and technology committee looked into the ABC classification of illegal drugs, and found it was rubbish. This is not an article about that report, but it is a good place to start: drugs, they found, are supposed to be ranked by harm, in classes A, B, and C, but they're not; and the ranking is supposed to act as a Rating: 5