Quote Originally Posted by Gumby
It wasn't Alex Jones who interviewed them... It was the BBC... and it is well documented... you just have to google it to find the interviews. Just because people are spoon feeding you the information doesn't mean it isn't out there. I think you are mistaking lack of evidence with your lack of willingness to look for the evidence.

If you can't find enough proof that they are alive, where is the proof that they are dead? Why are you content with believing they died without evidence yet push aside the fact they are alive because you don't see a picture of them side by side with fingerprints??
It's not pushing aside. It's being indifferent to the idea. This "well documented" part. Wouldn't you be providing it to support your argument? I think that would be a more through message than these 8 points, that the US government attacked us? To give you some credit, sure, there is a lack of willingness and apathy on my part to look for some credible supporting evidence while weaving out the junk. However, the USA government can't legally prove that any of the terrorists are dead. Why do you assume I automatically believe their story? It's their "official story", it's the widespread belief that all antagonistic accounts are based upon.

I seen one BBC article on it about 2 weeks after 9/11/01, which states that 4 of them turned up alive, with an acknowledgement from FBI Director Robert Mueller. But what does that exactly prove? That the USA mistakenly identified them? This doesn't prove motive.