Quote Originally Posted by jamstigator
It's anti-Semitic, not anti-semantic. I'm not sure the latter has any meaning. And judging from the title of the thread, I thought that was the point: someone was postulating that Hezbollah has nothing against Jews, when in fact they operate their own racist printshops and pay to have the racist videos that they produce aired on television for the masses.

Sure, they're just a 'cult', but they're a cult with good funding from Iran and Syria, who use that funding to spread a message of hate to the masses. How powerful would Hitler have ever become if he hadn't been able to easily spread HIS messages of hate to the masses via radio and television? Giving a known terrorist organization (and 95 percent of the nations of the world consider them exactly that) access to mass media piped into everyones' living rooms just helps spread their messages of hate and encourages the violence.

I still find it weird to see anyone American defend Hezbollah. These are the guys that blew up hundreds of our people. In my book, that makes them an enemy. I guess I'm just unforgiving that way: when a group blows up hundreds of my fellow citizens, I like to see them get blown up some too. The more vertical Hezbollah members that are permanently transformed into horizontal Hezbollah members, the less hate and violence there will be.

i'm not defending hizbullah. i'm making my point now: radical islam is not true islam. radical islam is to osama bin laden as jim jones was to christianity.