yes but how to prove it was illegal search and seizure when they cover their tracks to make it look and sound 'legal' and whos word are they going to believe a 'trustworthy enforcer of laws and protecter of the innocent' (I use that phrase lightly) or a 'pothead hippy'. I've argued that case all to many times and lawyers too. That would all be will and good if we lived in 'just' world. But we don't and it doesn't.