View Poll Results: Should America be sending weapons to Isreal ?
- Voters
- 61. You may not vote on this poll
-
Yes
20 32.79% -
No
36 59.02% -
Don't know
5 8.20%
Results 51 to 60 of 131
-
08-10-2006, 02:31 AM #51
OPSenior Member
Isreal and American support for violence.
And I'm sure that if you used a fucking big bomb and took out half the neighbourhood in so doing, the local police chief would give you a medal.
Originally Posted by PigSnout
Get real man if you killed innocent bystanders while defending yourself do you really think you're going anywhere but prison?
-
08-10-2006, 12:53 PM #52
Senior Member
Isreal and American support for violence.
wrong wrong wrong..
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
This week, USA started shiping bombs to Israel from Incirlik airbase Adana, Turkey.
-
08-10-2006, 12:58 PM #53
Senior Member
Isreal and American support for violence.
well said
Originally Posted by psychocat
I am very impressed by the knowledge you have, at the boards mostly people talk without any supported info, they say what they heard from others, you my friend, you know what you are talking about.
I am glad we are in the same boat on this subject.
-
08-10-2006, 01:01 PM #54
Senior Member
Isreal and American support for violence.
I hope those planes carpet bombs you and your family you red neck
Originally Posted by Torog
-
08-10-2006, 01:13 PM #55
Senior Member
Isreal and American support for violence.
why dont you write the names of dead arabs down, u cant? why? they are not human, not worth to think about? are they animals? too many to write down? say a thousand already dead?
Originally Posted by Bong30
getting bombed every day for decades is an usual part of life in that area while the rich jews are living behind the safety of their powerful military.
now jews lost eight people what a tragedy?
I am not arab but I am with the weak and right, Israel is powerful and mean. right is right wrong is wrong, explain a 6 year old kid he/she would be with the innocents cause kids dont think evilish, they are pure untill they got brainwashed.
Choose a side, but remember there are not two rights.
-
08-10-2006, 01:25 PM #56
OPSenior Member
Isreal and American support for violence.
For me it's a simple choice and it isn't Isreals choice or Irans or Lebanons or anyone elses, it's Americas choice.
America has to ask itself are we right in supplying enemies with firepower or should we be doing more to try to enforce peace on both sides?
You can't push off responsibility for your own actions by pointing at another and saying "but they do it"
Since when did two wrongs make a right ?
If the might of America and Europe was concentrated on peace instead of commerce (bombs and planes don't come cheap) we might actualy get somewhere.
If the US is so interested in justice then why did they stand by and watch the genocide in Rhwanda
You may not know this but the U.S. is BILLIONS of dollars behind in U.N. dues. BILLIONS! Yet when the U.N. went to the U.S. to ask for the use of equipment essential to helping the situation in Rhwanda- the U.S. only offered to "lease" it for a high price.
They owed BILLIONS of dollars to the UN yet they can't loan them equipment to save lives. Why?
Because Rhwanda offers nothing in return. There was no benefit to the US going there. It's only lives? right?
-
08-10-2006, 01:36 PM #57
Senior Member
Isreal and American support for violence.
This is why CLINTON ignored it:
Originally Posted by psychocat
PARIS A former French soldier said Friday that he saw French troops training Rwandan militias in 1992, two years before those same civilian militias took a leading role in a genocide in the tiny central African country.
Rwandan officials, including President Paul Kagame, have long accused France of training the militias that helped carry out the 1994 slaughter of about 500,000 people, most of them from the country's Tutsi minority. The genocide was orchestrated by a government of extremists from Rwanda's Hutu majority.
The French government, which had close ties with the extremist government, has denied training Rwandan civilians, and the Defense Ministry refused to comment Friday on the allegations made by Thierry Prungnaud, a former noncommissioned officer in the French Army.
"In 1992, I saw French military members training Rwandan civilian militias to shoot a gun," Prungnaud told France Culture radio. He said he had been sent to Rwanda that year to train the presidential guard.
"I am categorical. I saw it."
The training session took place in a national park closed to the public, according to Prungnaud. He said he was not surprised by what he saw, since he was unaware of the consequences. "To me, it seemed normal," he said.
"The only time that I saw them, there were about 30 militants being taught how to shoot in Akagera park," in eastern Rwanda, an area he said at the time was closed to the public and booby-trapped to keep unwanted visitors away.
Prungnaud said he was able to identify the men as civilians because members of the Rwandan military are always in uniform. He identified the trainers as members of the French Navy's 1st Parachute Regiment.
Although he stayed in Rwanda only for a brief period, he said, "I assume that the training continued."
In February, six Rwandans brought charges of "complicity in a genocide" against the French military at the Army Tribunal in Paris.
In a speech last year commemorating the 10th anniversary of the genocide, Kagame, a Tutsi, accused France of complicity in the genocide, saying the French "consciously trained and armed" Rwandan soldiers and militias and "knew they were going to perpetrate a genocide." The French Foreign Ministry called the accusations "grave and contrary to the truth."
Kagame led the Rwandan Patriotic Front rebels who overthrew the Hutu extremist regime and ended the genocide.
PARIS A former French soldier said Friday that he saw French troops training Rwandan militias in 1992, two years before those same civilian militias took a leading role in a genocide in the tiny central African country.
Rwandan officials, including President Paul Kagame, have long accused France of training the militias that helped carry out the 1994 slaughter of about 500,000 people, most of them from the country's Tutsi minority. The genocide was orchestrated by a government of extremists from Rwanda's Hutu majority.
The French government, which had close ties with the extremist government, has denied training Rwandan civilians, and the Defense Ministry refused to comment Friday on the allegations made by Thierry Prungnaud, a former noncommissioned officer in the French Army.
"In 1992, I saw French military members training Rwandan civilian militias to shoot a gun," Prungnaud told France Culture radio. He said he had been sent to Rwanda that year to train the presidential guard
http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/04/22/news/rwanda.php
Have a good one!:thumbsup:
-
08-10-2006, 01:48 PM #58
Senior Member
Isreal and American support for violence.
[quote=psychocat]
I called you a lib because you SOUND like one based on MY observation,not an insult.Liberal lmao oh boy not that old chestnut.You will have to do better than name calling.
THAT my friend was NOT an easy choice,or even a GOOD one,but it was NECESSARY or casualties would've been much LARGER!The atomic bomb being dropped once was the biggest criminal act ever,to do it twice was inhumane. Who would you fear someone who has never dropped the bomb or some sick fuck who had used it twice?
Not by themselves,but with Britain and Russia's help they did.America didn't join the fight in Europe till it was almost over, you can thank the Russians for the massive sacrifice they made that Europe wasn't ove-run.
That and the fact that Hitler didn't learn from Napoleon.The Americans like to think they won the war but to be honest THEY DIDN'T !
Didn't I mention droppin' leaflets TWICE?! Why do you not address that? And FURTHERMORE SHOW me where I advocate killin' children and STOP TWISTIN' MY WORDS!So what you're saying is that it's ok to attack children because you may kill a few terrorists?
I must've MISSED that one!And bombing funerals now thats so fucking right isn't it?CHEAP SHOT for someone who DESPARATELY wants to cling to his belief when he loses an argument!Please try to get your head out of the bodily orifice it presently occupies.
-
08-10-2006, 01:51 PM #59
Senior Member
Isreal and American support for violence.
My thoughts EXACTLY! He NEVER considers what Israel's goin' through!
Originally Posted by Bong30
-
08-10-2006, 01:56 PM #60
Senior Member
Isreal and American support for violence.
Mark Thanks............ we do see eye to eye on many issues.
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
Isreal or Palestine?
By Dream of the iris in forum PoliticsReplies: 23Last Post: 05-30-2008, 01:29 AM -
Does John McCain support the North American Union?
By Gandalf_The_Grey in forum PoliticsReplies: 1Last Post: 02-10-2008, 05:32 AM -
Raping American Sovereignty and a North American Union
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 11-13-2007, 04:40 AM -
Zogby Poll: Over 70 Million American Adults Support New 9/11 Investigation
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 5Last Post: 05-23-2006, 05:57 PM -
Isreal and American support for violence.
By in forum Current EventsReplies: 0Last Post: 01-01-1970, 12:00 AM








Register To Reply
Staff Online