I'm finding it disheartening that so called theorists are getting the same sort of treatment as an atheist would deliver to a Jehovah witness.

If you can't fathom the scope of what could have occurred that day, why attack those that can?

If you do not believe other people's interpretations of the evidence, and lack of evidence at hand...say you don't believe and leave it at that.

Breukelen...his testimony is based on...what an anonymous architect said that day. Had the person said 'No way a fire could do that'...what then would be his position?

Theres bound to be a joke that occurs to me later this day....'How many architects does it take to change Breukelen's mind?' sort of haha.

Another bit thats worthy of noting...'theorists' seem to have to defend their take on the matter...and are asked things like...'Where's your evidence?'

Thats a fair question...so I'd ask anyone not able and or wanting to not believe the likeliness of government involvement in distorting and manipulating physical evidence...where's your proof that someone hasn't perpetrated a cover-up?