Could the bible be prone to mistakes?

[Oneironaut]

Those example have the 'bib' tho. eh...I'm prolly barking up the wrong tree.

Yeah, just like the word biblical. In English, the spelling of a word typically reveals more about its etymology than its pronunciation anyways.

Can't help now but think of the bible as the 'book of books'.

Well, originally it was just called "the books", and the Greek word for "the books" became the name of the whole collection of books throughout Europe.

Danka 1iron :thumbsup:

Actually, my username (pronounced own-EYE-run-ought) is also Greek in origin. It comes from the root oneiro, which means "dream", and nautês, which means "explorer". It has nothing to do with the numeral one or the element iron.

Oneironaut Reviewed by Oneironaut on 08-14-2006. Could the bible be prone to mistakes? Well, it is my belief that everything regarding spirituality in the Bible needs to be taken with a grain of salt. Here is why: there are many different passages scattered throughout that completely contradict each other in both the Old and New Testaments. This means that someone within the history of the Bible must have been writing something false. In essence, the bible does indeed lie, or stretch the truth. For those conservative christians who still aren't sure, take the first four books of Rating: 5