Anyone else ever read Genisis and find it to be hugely contradictory to the rest of the bible?

Never mind the 'ew' that goes with realizing Genisis is chock full of incest. What I've wondered about for several years now is...

Why weren't Adam and Eve married?

There they were, making babies before the eyes of gOD...but OUTSIDE of wedlock. Which sets up that, to gOD, marriage is not required for man and woman to copulate.

So did gOD screw that one up...or is it evidence of the hand of man looking to impart his view of marriage into the bible?

And while I'm at it here...

Every word I can think of that begins with the prefix 'bi', is denoting the presence of two.

bifocal -- bilingual -- bipedal -- bicycle -- bifurcate -- bilateral -- bicarbonate, etc etc..as long as they have the pronunciation 'bi' (a word like 'bibber' doesn't have the 'bi' pronunciation)

So 'bi-ble', is meaning what exactly?

Maybe Oneironaut will put those etymology skills to work on it.
slowthestone Reviewed by slowthestone on . Could the bible be prone to mistakes? Well, it is my belief that everything regarding spirituality in the Bible needs to be taken with a grain of salt. Here is why: there are many different passages scattered throughout that completely contradict each other in both the Old and New Testaments. This means that someone within the history of the Bible must have been writing something false. In essence, the bible does indeed lie, or stretch the truth. For those conservative christians who still aren't sure, take the first four books of Rating: 5