Carl Cameron? You kidding me? Does anyone believe anything he says? He never backs up anything with proof. Just innuendos and allegations.

Here's a quote from a less-biased source than that whacko:

'Cameron reported these earlier investigations into Amdocs during a May 5th, 2000 broadcast on Fox, describing an ??alleged penetration of U.S. government phone systems.? Only towards the end of his overheated report did Cameron admit that ??there are no targeted suspects under investigation because there is no information to suggest a phone breach.? But then, apparently realizing he had just shot down his own report, the reporter immediately contradicted himself, claiming, ??There is clearly a breach here, some sort of threat.?'

What kind of shitty-ass reporting is that? So he hypes a story, defames some Israelis, then admits there are no suspects because there is no evidence, zero, that any of this happened. That ain't news. That's spin. Stuck his foot in his mouth there at the end, by admitting it was all a bunch of cow manure backed up by...nothing.

Hell, he couldn't even get the facts right. Amdocs is not a mysterious private company. It's traded publicly on the NYSE as DOX. A real reporter would have done due diligence. Unfortunately, Fox doesn't employ real reporters, they employ spin doctors.

The New York Times reported:

'The federal authorities conducted a highly classified espionage investigation into whether Israeli intelligence agents used a software company in Missouri to intercept telephone conversations from the White House, State Department and other agencies, government officials said today.

The counterintelligence inquiry did not find evidence that government telephone systems were penetrated, the officials said. The investigation focused on the Amdocs Corporation, a publicly traded corporation founded by Israelis, but failed to unearth evidence that anyone at the company or connected to it had tried to listen to government communications illegally, the officials said.

??There just weren??t any facts to support a penetration,? said a government official who closely followed the inquiry.

The existence of the inquiry emerged today after Insight Magazine, which is published by The Washington Times, reported that the investigation had uncovered a security breach in the White House telephone system. Other news organizations quickly spread the story over their Web sites, but the accusation of a major espionage problem collapsed almost immediately. ...'

You're either as gullible as it's possible to be, eg420ne (you have to be gullible to take Cameron seriously), or you're exposing your own anti-Semitic leanings by propogating unsubstantiated smear campaigns. Either way, you're a patsy. The only question is whether you're an unknowing or a voluntary one.