You will lose the 'hybrid vigor' with F2's.
Plus, how would you know if the male you used was a 'genetic champ'?

If you only pollinate one female, or use just one male, you are putting EVERYTHING into one basket.

You could take three women, Tyra Banks, Brooke Burke, and Condi Rice.
Now if you use Woody Allan's genes, the first 2 female choices would be good moms, but maybe not exactly what is best for Woody.
A Condi X Woody, could be a better choice, both are intelligent & have power with the media, to reach the community.
BUT... most would forget Woody and use Arnold Schwarzenegger.
A Burke X Schwarzenegger or a Banks X Schwarzenegger, would have [the potential for] great physical features. There offspring would be more predisposed for physical greatness. A Condi X Arnold, might be a good balance, but not as much of a KO as the other two.

But what if you used Peter Griffin (The Family Guy) as the father? Well, my opinion is that you would have less of a chance of making a better female offspring than the mothers you had in the first place. You would improve the male side of the gene pool (Peters son's would not be as stupid,fat,lazy). But the males would need to be used again to breed with females (we don't want males for anything other than breeding.). This would only be done if you were trying to get a specific trait from a male (OMG, this would almost never happen), say Peter's rapist wit! (heyheyheyheyheyehey)


Since almost no one grows males from seed to death, how do you know what traits to look for in a male?

Think of your female as your daughter.
It's time to marry her away, do you want to choose from 5 guys or 100 guys or the 1 guy that showed up at your door and you decided not to kill. And since almost no one grows males, lets say that you do not speak the same language as your daughters suitors.

If your gonna breed do it wil Arnold and not Danny Devito