Wow. I had no idea people had even attempted restoration! I know there've been restorations to repair botched circumcisions, of course, but I didn't know there'd ever been restorations just for the sake of restorations.

Breuk knows a lot more about this area than I do, Shoi, having researched it for a long time and caring so much about this subject. I also tend to believe that first-hand penis-owners can address this subject more knowledgably.

It certainly makes perfect sense that even with restoration, no nerve function would return. The thing about removed or altered body parts is that the nerve endings they contain go/change with them (in this case it's really more the newly exposed glans whose sensitivity changes and desensitizes after circumcision, right, Breuk?). But to further impede any restoration of nerve function in foreskin removal or any other sort of "amputation," over time the neural pathways in the brain that correspondingly allow the body to feel sensation also shrink back and wither away. So even if add-back foreskins were widely available and widely restored, unless they were restored very quickly, the brain would have already made its neural adjustments and men wouldn't easily regain sensation anyway, even with the most skilled reattachment.