Breukelen Advocaat, maybe you're putting female circumcision with male circumcision, I would agree that female circumcision is mutilation. Like in your second article which put male and female circumcision together, that is totally invalid for female circumcision is done in some tribal cultures as a way to control women from having sex with other men. What they do is cut the labia and clitoris out and sew the hole shut, only to open it for sex with their husband, and sew it shut again after they are done. This female circumcision is usually done when the girl is a young child, not an infant, without anesthetics, therefore making it extremely painful.

Its safe to say that female circumcision is mutilation for it makes their genitals disfunctional, but in the case of male circumcision the functionality isn't altered, therefore its not MUTILATION. So will you stop using that word, get more reliable sources, and just relax about this issue? This post is about who is circumsized and who is not, not an argument about which is better than the other.