Quote Originally Posted by Great Spirit
No I'm sorry. I suggest you watch the PBS interview with Larry Silverstein where he definately makes it clear that "pull it" means demolishment.
Lol I'm telling you that's the worst piece of evidence going for you guys. I know "pull it" is a term for demolitions, but the fire cheif had no reason to want to blow the building with his own men inside. I've heard this point brought up on conservative radio so many times when someone's trying to prove their point.

I'm telling you, I'm right there cheering them on, hoping they get some people thinking. Then they bring up that "pull it" line and it kills the whole debate. It's seriously rediculous. That kind of thing wouldn't even be an issue if it were brought to court. It's fickle.

The physics of how the buildings fell (free-fall), the missing money in trillions, the cell phone calls from the airplanes, and what the hell Cheney meant by "of course the orders still stand" are the best things you have going for you guys.

I'm not convinced yet. The CTs need to focus more on the physics and irrefutable evidence; that's the only way people will listen. But you didn't think making the case for a national government conspiracy was going to be easy, did you? =)