What is the chemical makeup of low-grade Cannabis? Would something like "Texel Eco" be higher in CBN content?

Obviously, the THC/CBN ratio is higher in Haze than in Afghani. And, obviously, Haze will get you higher.

So, would Mexican schwag be higher in CBN content, thusly making, even, dirt weed 100% good for you?

I know, for a fact, that you should not hold in lower-grade Marijuana-smoke as lung (Freudian slip) as higher grade, I think, because of the tar difference.

My question would be: (Well, besides the third paragraph) Is all Weed perfectly good for you?

Oh, wait, I asked that. My question would be: (see 3rd paragraph)

AND

What else would be different ,besides the THC/CBN ratio, between the quality of buds?



Continuance from below:
speech of poorly educated people straining to sound stylish. The word has subsequently gained some currency in educated usage, but it is still often regarded as incorrect. A large majority of the Usage Panel found it unacceptable in an earlier survey. In formal writing thus can still be used as in the examples above; in other styles this way, like this, and other such expressions are more natural.
beachguy in thongs Reviewed by beachguy in thongs on . Question about low-grade: What is the chemical makeup of low-grade Cannabis? Would something like "Texel Eco" be higher in CBN content? Obviously, the THC/CBN ratio is higher in Haze than in Afghani. And, obviously, Haze will get you higher. So, would Mexican schwag be higher in CBN content, thusly making, even, dirt weed 100% good for you? I know, for a fact, that you should not hold in lower-grade Marijuana-smoke as lung (Freudian slip) as higher grade, I think, because of the tar difference. My Rating: 5