Once again, you fail to answer the questions because it blows your retarded "no wmd" lie out of the water. Allow me to ask you again because you clearly fail to understand that pre/post-1991 means nothing.

1) How many pre-1991 WMD's did Saddam claim he had? (A: 0)
2) How many pre-1991 WMD's was Saddam allowed to have (A: 0)
3) How many WMD's do the anti-war/Bush retards claim were in Iraq? (A: 0)

Yet, in all actuallity, we've found over 500 and YOU (along with other mental midgets, I'm sure) think that, for *some* reason, that Saddam with post 1991 WMDs = bad but Saddam with pre-1991 WMD's is OK? What oriface did you pull that out of, the same one you keep your heads?