The U.S. Chicken Hawk Congress

[graymatter]

In a 256-153 vote that mirrored the position taken by the Senate earlier, the GOP-led House approved a nonbinding resolution that praises U.S. troops, labels the Iraq war part of the larger global fight against terrorism and says an "arbitrary date for the withdrawal or redeployment" of troops is not in the national interest.

This is an excellent example of how republicans "box" the debate. Let's see how it works. If you're against terrorism, then you have to praise the troops (ok, so that rules out people that kick puppies and steal from their grandmother) and you must support the war in Iraq...

You could drive the remaining stock on Hummers through the holes in that resolution.

graymatter Reviewed by graymatter on 06-17-2006. The U.S. Chicken Hawk Congress In a 256-153 vote that mirrored the position taken by the Senate earlier, the GOP-led House approved a nonbinding resolution that praises U.S. troops, labels the Iraq war part of the larger global fight against terrorism and says an "arbitrary date for the withdrawal or redeployment" of troops is not in the national interest. This is an excellent example of how republicans "box" the debate. Let's see how it works. If you're against terrorism, then you have to praise the troops (ok, so that Rating: 5

[iamapatient]

Or...if you're a terrorist you can blame the US/Bush/Military for everything like many of the left on these forums.

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/15/D8I8LJBG0.html

To use the media for spreading an effective and creative image of the resistance.

Funny which side sounds more like terrorists and which side sounds like patriots, isn't? You know the old saying, if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's most likely a duck.

[intangible child]

Or...if you're a terrorist you can blame the US/Bush/Military for everything like many of the left on these forums.

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/15/D8I8LJBG0.html

Funny which side sounds more like terrorists and which side sounds like patriots, isn't? You know the old saying, if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's most likely a duck.

Starting a war on a foreign soil under the lies that Saddam had WMDs!


Stop the Iraq war before Our Nationâ??s last young women and men have given their blood on some foreign battle field for the hubris sub-human regime that has taken over the U.S.

Bush Flatly Declares No Connection Between Saddam and al Qaeda
from the press conference, 31 Jan 2003
http://www.thememoryhole.org/war/no-saddam-qaeda.htm


Oh yeah we are going to liberate them, while the Constitution is being shredded here in our country and we have the "unpatriotic acts" , â??Leave No Tree Standing Actâ??, â??Dirty Skies Initiativeâ?? , "no child left alive"

OPERATION
IRAQI
LIBERATION

----------------------
"If our nation is ever taken over, it will be taken over from within." ~ President James Madison

[graymatter]

Or...if you're a terrorist you can blame the US/Bush/Military for everything like many of the left on these forums.

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/15/D8I8LJBG0.html

Funny which side sounds more like terrorists and which side sounds like patriots, isn't? You know the old saying, if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's most likely a duck.

I just read that piece, and it illustrates why terrorism is borderless. GW and the rest of his cronies made the war against terrorism one against nations, of soil. Terrorists operate outside that "acceptable" landscape of confrontation. Too bad we had a president (and Congress) too stupid and ill advised to realize it.

[graymatter]

And, yes, the Congress is also spineless...

[graymatter]

Starting a war on a foreign soil under the lies that Saddam had WMDs!


Stop the Iraq war before Our Nationâ??s last young women and men have given their blood on some foreign battle field for the hubris sub-human regime that has taken over the U.S.[/SIZE][/B]

Bush Flatly Declares No Connection Between Saddam and al Qaeda
from the press conference, 31 Jan 2003
http://www.thememoryhole.org/war/no-saddam-qaeda.htm


Oh yeah we are going to liberate them, while the Constitution is being shredded here in our country and we have the "unpatriotic acts" , â??Leave No Tree Standing Actâ??, â??Dirty Skies Initiativeâ?? , "no child left alive"

OPERATION
IRAQI
LIBERATION

----------------------
"If our nation is ever taken over, it will be taken over from within." ~ President James Madison

Hey, I'm glad you're pissed off but can you stop shouting? Your font is hurting my ears! Peace :smokin:

[iamapatient]

He has to overcompensate with font because of his lack of reason.

There's plenty of connection to Iraq and al-queda, just no "operational command and control," odd how that gets in the way, isn't it? In addition to links to al-queda there were links to other terrorists groups as well. Once agian, the WOT, is more than a hunt for Osama. Funny which side some of you are on.

[graymatter]

He has to overcompensate with font because of his lack of reason.

There's plenty of connection to Iraq and al-queda, just no "operational command and control," odd how that gets in the way, isn't it? In addition to links to al-queda there were links to other terrorists groups as well. Once agian, the WOT, is more than a hunt for Osama. Funny which side some of you are on.

I don't have a problem with his opinion and expression of outrage... actually, it's bold and I like it but it's late and I'm in a small text mood.

I don't understand what you mean with your last statement... "Funny which side some of you are on." Sorry, I don't get it.

[iamapatient]

Opinion is fine as long as based on reality and not delusion. I have zero respect for opinions based on retardation.

Of course you don't understand...
I think it's pretty clear, some people are on one side of the WOT and then there are others, here on these forums. Everyone has to pick a side, I guess...who's side are you on again? *shrug*

[graymatter]

Opinion is fine as long as based on reality and not delusion. I have zero respect for opinions based on retardation.

Of course you don't understand...
I think it's pretty clear, some people are on one side of the WOT and then there are others, here on these forums. Everyone has to pick a side, I guess...who's side are you on again? *shrug*

I hope your friends in congress respect you in the morning.