Results 1 to 10 of 15
Hybrid View
-
06-17-2006, 01:40 AM #1
Senior Member
Supreme Court upholds no-knock police search
The big hurry, moron, is that evidence can be flushed. The Constitution says they have to have a warrant, the SCOTUS said that knocking and waiting 3-5-15 secs, or not, wouldn't have made a difference. Sorry, Chicken Little, the sky isn't falling no matter how big a mountain you try to make of a molehill....again.
Originally Posted by pisshead
iamapatient Reviewed by iamapatient on . Supreme Court upholds no-knock police search what's the big hurry to bust down doors and shout at people? can't the loving cops in black masks and stormtrooper gear who are protecting our freedom and serving us wait for just a minute? one step closer to the new freedom of dictatorship. Supreme Court upholds no-knock police search AP | June 16 2006 The Supreme Court made it easier today for police to barge into homes and seize evidence without knocking or waiting, a sign of the court's new conservatism with Samuel Alito on Rating: 5
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
Supreme Court Debates Warrantless Entry When Police Smell Marijuana
By stuartambient in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 2Last Post: 01-18-2011, 04:46 AM -
Supreme Ct. Upholds Anti-Terror Law
By Islandborn in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 06-21-2010, 05:41 PM -
NV - SUPREME COURT TOSSES DRUG CASE OVER ILLEGAL SEARCH
By Galaxy in forum LegalReplies: 1Last Post: 05-23-2009, 05:12 PM -
Supreme Court upholds photo ID law for voters in Indiana
By Psycho4Bud in forum PoliticsReplies: 3Last Post: 05-02-2008, 11:59 AM -
Supreme Court Upholds Campus Military Recruiting
By amsterdam in forum PoliticsReplies: 1Last Post: 03-09-2006, 05:56 AM










Register To Reply
Staff Online