Activity Stream
227,828 MEMBERS
11019 ONLINE
greengrassforums On YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletter greengrassforums On Twitter greengrassforums On Facebook greengrassforums On Google+
banner1

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1.     
    #1
    Senior Member

    Supreme Court upholds no-knock police search

    This applies to a warrant situation, I assume. We're still protected under the constitution, for now. :thumbsup:
    graymatter Reviewed by graymatter on . Supreme Court upholds no-knock police search what's the big hurry to bust down doors and shout at people? can't the loving cops in black masks and stormtrooper gear who are protecting our freedom and serving us wait for just a minute? one step closer to the new freedom of dictatorship. Supreme Court upholds no-knock police search AP | June 16 2006 The Supreme Court made it easier today for police to barge into homes and seize evidence without knocking or waiting, a sign of the court's new conservatism with Samuel Alito on Rating: 5
    Those are my principles. If you don\'t like them I have others. -Groucho Marx

  2.   Advertisements

  3.     
    #2
    Senior Member

    Supreme Court upholds no-knock police search

    This is stupid. Warrant or not its destruction of private property.

    "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." - 4th amendment to the US constitution.

    I guess its all about what classifies as 'unreasonable' nowadays. I think breaking down your door and shooting your wife in the head cause she ran out of fear counts. Apparently the courts don't agree.

    "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." - 2nd amendment to the US constitution.

    And this is why you shoot the f**king pig who bangs your door down.

  4.     
    #3
    Senior Member

    Supreme Court upholds no-knock police search

    Man I was talking to my poli sci teacher about the purpose of the 2nd amendment he says for the formation of miltia but he relates militia directly to the national guard. I belave the 2nd ammendment is in place to make sure of a well armed populas so that they are able to combat any oppression foreign or domestic.

  5.     
    #4
    Senior Member

    Supreme Court upholds no-knock police search

    if you read the federalist papers, they make it quite clear that the 2nd amendment is for exactly what you said, to defend yourself against foreign and domestic enemies...not just for militias...

  6.     
    #5
    Senior Member

    Supreme Court upholds no-knock police search

    Quote Originally Posted by Myth1184
    you guys are morons...

    Giving people who are probably armed a warning you are coming thru the door is just ample time for them to grab their shotgun and point it at the Door.

    This is a good move
    Speak for your self!
    If anyone brakes down my door, they'll get my collection of knives stuck in their stomachs. I don't have any guns unfortunately... But have fun licking the grownd after your master's guards knock you down.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-18-2011, 04:46 AM
  2. Supreme Ct. Upholds Anti-Terror Law
    By Islandborn in forum Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-21-2010, 05:41 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-23-2009, 05:12 PM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-02-2008, 11:59 AM
  5. Supreme Court Upholds Campus Military Recruiting
    By amsterdam in forum Politics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-09-2006, 05:56 AM
Amount:

Enter a message for the receiver:
BE SOCIAL
GreenGrassForums On Facebook