Results 11 to 15 of 15
Hybrid View
-
06-19-2006, 01:35 PM #1
Senior Member
Supreme Court upholds no-knock police search
This applies to a warrant situation, I assume. We're still protected under the constitution, for now. :thumbsup:
graymatter Reviewed by graymatter on . Supreme Court upholds no-knock police search what's the big hurry to bust down doors and shout at people? can't the loving cops in black masks and stormtrooper gear who are protecting our freedom and serving us wait for just a minute? one step closer to the new freedom of dictatorship. Supreme Court upholds no-knock police search AP | June 16 2006 The Supreme Court made it easier today for police to barge into homes and seize evidence without knocking or waiting, a sign of the court's new conservatism with Samuel Alito on Rating: 5Those are my principles. If you don\'t like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
-
06-19-2006, 01:51 PM #2
Senior Member
Supreme Court upholds no-knock police search
This is stupid. Warrant or not its destruction of private property.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." - 4th amendment to the US constitution.
I guess its all about what classifies as 'unreasonable' nowadays. I think breaking down your door and shooting your wife in the head cause she ran out of fear counts. Apparently the courts don't agree.
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." - 2nd amendment to the US constitution.
And this is why you shoot the f**king pig who bangs your door down.
-
06-20-2006, 03:22 PM #3
Senior Member
Supreme Court upholds no-knock police search
Man I was talking to my poli sci teacher about the purpose of the 2nd amendment he says for the formation of miltia but he relates militia directly to the national guard. I belave the 2nd ammendment is in place to make sure of a well armed populas so that they are able to combat any oppression foreign or domestic.
-
06-20-2006, 04:01 PM #4
OPSenior Member
Supreme Court upholds no-knock police search
if you read the federalist papers, they make it quite clear that the 2nd amendment is for exactly what you said, to defend yourself against foreign and domestic enemies...not just for militias...
-
06-21-2006, 06:29 PM #5
Senior Member
Supreme Court upholds no-knock police search
Speak for your self!
Originally Posted by Myth1184
If anyone brakes down my door, they'll get my collection of knives stuck in their stomachs. I don't have any guns unfortunately... But have fun licking the grownd after your master's guards knock you down.
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
Supreme Court Debates Warrantless Entry When Police Smell Marijuana
By stuartambient in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 2Last Post: 01-18-2011, 04:46 AM -
Supreme Ct. Upholds Anti-Terror Law
By Islandborn in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 06-21-2010, 05:41 PM -
NV - SUPREME COURT TOSSES DRUG CASE OVER ILLEGAL SEARCH
By Galaxy in forum LegalReplies: 1Last Post: 05-23-2009, 05:12 PM -
Supreme Court upholds photo ID law for voters in Indiana
By Psycho4Bud in forum PoliticsReplies: 3Last Post: 05-02-2008, 11:59 AM -
Supreme Court Upholds Campus Military Recruiting
By amsterdam in forum PoliticsReplies: 1Last Post: 03-09-2006, 05:56 AM










Register To Reply
Staff Online