Quote Originally Posted by iamapatient
Unfortunately, most alternatives are not near term solutions due to ineffeciency and other drawbacks such as cost, production and availability.
Thanks for summarizing the Conservative rationale. Liberals and socialists and communists and tree huggers and pixie dust spreaders have been out front on the sitution (granted, in a house divided manner) for the "near term" of over 30 years now.

When's the last time a republican said, "You know what, we're fucking up our environment and we need to 'think outside the box' on this". Republicans are good at saying "think outside the box" so long as it doesn't involve cost, production and availability, unless it comes to a near term SPENDING policy of sending troops to throw out a bumbling dictator in order to create global instability.

What a great use of our most valuable resources... Your shot, Iam. You're growing on me, baby! :thumbsup:
graymatter Reviewed by graymatter on . The SKY is falling!!! (OK, not really) http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/harris061206.htm Sorry, Chicken Little, it's just another nut. ;) Rating: 5